How authority is bounded in the current model, with missing public-policy evidence kept visible.
The owner-approved model is not an uncontrolled public DAO: the High Priest retains final authority and the Church Council assists within approved responsibilities. Public token voting does not replace that authority.
This page does not claim that a complete operational charter, public decision log, conflict-of-interest process, appeal route, or production governance evidence has been approved.
Implementation disclosure
Review and activation boundary
This page records current strict non-production behavior. It is not an approved production policy, certification, legal opinion, or owner acceptance.
Publication status
Source-backed implementation disclosure
Required review
Owner or qualified review pending
Effective date
Not assigned
Production readiness
Not claimed
Identity and legal boundary
Public brand
Church of Digital Freedom
Project legal name
Crypto Church International
Registration and legal status
Not verified or claimed without approved evidence
Current authority model
Governance model
Owner-led non-production model
Final authority
High Priest
Church Council role
Assists only within approved responsibilities
Public DAO or token voting
Does not replace final authority
Technical login-role mapping
Pending an explicit owner decision; no mapping is claimed
Authority boundary
Privileged roles are not granted by ordinary registration or client input. Sensitive actions require server authorization, actor attribution, least privilege, and auditable history.
Decision integrity
Owner silence is pending, never acceptance. Financial, legal, doctrinal, privacy, production, and fundamental authority decisions remain behind their explicit gates.
Still required
A versioned public charter, accountable document owner, effective date, decision-publication rules, concern and conflict path, and operational evidence remain pending unless separately approved.